Answers and Analysis
This knowledge base, updated to include the analyses from the 2003 through the most recent editions of the Uniform Plumbing and Mechanical Codes, continues to be a premier source for engineers, inspectors, students, contractors and tradesmen. Questions come from a broad base of users, and answers are informal interpretations of the Codes provided by a committee of code officials and special experts - they are clearly stated and to the point. This updated site combines the most pertinent analyses from the previous manual and presents them together with those based on the most recent publications of the Uniform Codes. This makes the Answers and Analysis database one of the most valuable tools you as a member can access wherever you have an internet connection.
The Answers and Analysis tool makes it easy to search for relevant questions and answers, either based on keywords or specific sections/chapters of the code. To find questions related to specific topics, type in the keyword(s), select the code and the year and click "Search". To search for questions related to a specific section, type the section in the Section field and click "Search". To search a specific chapter or appendix, select either the UPC or UMC Table of Contents, and select the chapter/appendix from the list.
Questions matching UPC Chapter 11
26 results
points of surface discharge from these specific structures.
Sections 1101.3, 1102.1 and 1102.2 reference these same piping materials as being acceptable for use
within a building for rainwater drainage.
Table 14-1 (Plumbing Material Standards) references the ASTM standards for both A-53 and A-120
steel pipe. Each of these classifications offers a variety of wall thicknesses, but none are less than
Schedule 40.
All steel pipe used within a building which conveys products which are covered by the UPC (potable
water or waste water) must have a minimum wall thickness not less than Schedule 40.
System description: multiple roof drains and overflows; all roof drains and overflows are "combined
systems" connected to vertical piping of the primary system (no scuppers).
The combined vertical section downstream of the primary secondary connection is sized for double the
rainfall amount. The subsequent downstream horizontal sections are sized at a standard rainfall rate.
rainfall rate go into effect.
building?
aluminum, copper and galvanized sheet metals, and all materials approved for above ground waste and
vent pipe. That would include the use of ABS and PVC pipe. Installation Standard IS-9 and IS-5, if adopted,
prohibits installing these materials in direct sunlight and would therefore require that if used that they be
protected from sun rays in a manner approved by the AHJ.
materials which would be suitable for a sanitary sewer installation would be equally suitable for transporting
storm water (see Table 14-1(2003/2006/2009) Table 1401.1 (2012), Drains – Storm).
joined?
joined?
pipe?
in making transitions to the various rainwater piping systems.
The only time an overflow drain would normally come into use would be due to a blockage of the
strainer on the primary drain. This blockage could be caused by accumulation of debris on the roof which
could enter the drainage system through an unprotected overflow, rendering the entire storm drainage
system inoperative.
The strainer requirement would be the same, whether the overflow were installed on either a vertical
or a horizontal plane.
To comply with this section, in a multi-story building with a parking garage at the first level, does the Code allow the secondary roof drain to connect to the vertical roof drain conductor at a 45 degree angle before the conductor turns horizontal to exit the building through the garage ceiling?
Is the horizontal portion of the roof drain system within the garage ceiling in the above scenario considered a "horizontal offset below the roof"?
If this section of pipe is considered a horizontal offset, does the secondary roof drain have to connect downstream of this section of pipe to comply with this section?
The canopy itself is only 304 sq/ft total.
The vertical outside wall above the canopy is 259' high by 152' wide, which equals 39,368 sq ft. Do I figure 50% of the vertical wall surface or less?
What tables should be used for determining the size of canopy drains?
Section 1102.1.1 (2009/2012) reference to “standard weight” steel piping is additional language for section 1102.1 (2009/2012). Thus the reference to Table 701.1 (2012) in Section 1102.1 (2009/2012) would include the requirement to use schedule 40 or better steel piping that meets the ASTM A53 standard.
The language in the 2015 UPC was revised with better clarity,
1101.4.2 Conductors. Conductors installed aboveground in buildings shall be in accordance with the applicable standards referenced in Table 701.2 for aboveground drain, waste, and vent pipe. Conductors installed aboveground level shall be of seamless copper water tube, Type K, L, or M; Schedule 40 copper pipe or Schedule 40 copper alloy pipe; Type DWV copper drainage tube; service weight cast-iron soil pipe or hubless cast-iron soil pipe; standard weight galvanized steel pipe; stainless steel 304 or 316L [stainless steel 304 pipe and fittings shall not be installed underground and shall be kept not less than 6 inches (152 mm) aboveground]; or Schedule 40 ABS or Schedule 40 PVC plastic pipe.
Comment
2015 UPC section 709.1, section 710.2, and section 1101.6.2 state that the systems shall be designed to be drained by gravity where possible and practicable but Section 1101.14 does not address this issue for rainwater drains.
Comment:
Is it to assure a sufficient holding capacity of the drainage pipe, to assure a minimum flow rate? What justifies 3 inches?
2. Are 1/4 bends considered allowable fittings per code for site storm sewer changes of directions? (horizontal and vertical) (Outside the building below grade)
Comment:
The IOR has rejected a 6" 1/4 bend that is located outside the building (below grade) in a horizontal storm sewer. He is stating that this change of direction must be made using two 45's or an equivalent radius of two 45's per 706.0.
Per UPC 1101.4, only conductors are required to meet materials and change of direction requirements in section 706.0
We find no language or requirements for storm sewers other than using "materials and design to perform their intended function." Please confirm
2. See answer #1.
Note: SDR 35 PVC, unless approved by the local jurisdiction, is not an acceptable material for sanitary sewers (Section 715.1) or storm sewers (Section 1101.4.5) as prescribed in Table 701.2
2. Is Table 1101.11 or Table 1101.7 applicable to the design of a Scupper opening for a Primary Roof Drain configuration?
2. No. The sizing of scuppers, per Section 1101.11.2.1, shall have an opening not less than 4 inches high and have a width equal to the circumference of the roof drain required for the area served.
2. Could these structures be subjected to testing and obtain a listing?
3. Is there a standard that would be sufficient for the testing procedure for these structures?
4. Is the current piping used in these structures listed as approved drainage or sewer piping material?
5. Is the current method used to create these structures an approved method?
Comment:
Nyloplast contends their drainage structures are not covered by the UPC. Their position is that structures which aid in directing and discharging of rain water from a plot of land are not covered by the UPC. Therefore, if these structures are not covered by the code, we should not be questioning these structures as to their manufacture or their installation.
My Building Official is preparing for the expeditious adoption of the 2018 UPC in our new code package. He would like to inform Nyloplast one way or the other as to whether their current structures are going to be allowed in our city KCMO.
2. Yes. Section 301.2 (Minimum Standards) requires all “pipe, pipe fittings, traps, fixtures, material, and devices used in a plumbing system” to be tested to applicable standards and certified by an approved third party listing agency.
3. No. The staff for IAPMO’s Standards Development Department could not find a current standard that would apply to this product. They did indicate that a standard could be developed for the product.
4. Yes. The piping for storm sewers, per Section 1101.4.5, shall comply with the applicable standards referenced in Table 701.2 for building sewer pipe.
5. No. As stated in answer 2, all material connected to a plumbing system shall be tested to applicable standards and certified by an approved third party listing agency.
*Plumbing System. Includes all potable water, alternate water sources, building supply, and distribution pipes; all plumbing fixtures and traps; all drainage and vent pipes; and all building drains and building sewers, including their respective joints and connections, devices, receptors, and appurtenances within the property lines of the premises and shall include potable water piping, potable water treating or
using equipment, medical gas and medical vacuum systems, liquid and fuel gas piping, and water heaters and vents for same.
**Plumbing Fixture. An approved type installed receptacle, device or appliance that is supplied with water or that receives liquid or liquid-borne wastes and discharges such wastes into the drainage system to which it may be directly or indirectly connected. Industrial or commercial tanks, vats, and similar
processing equipment are not plumbing fixtures, but may be connected to or discharged into approved traps or plumbing fixtures where and as otherwise provided for elsewhere in this code.
2. We also have ‘rock pockets’ and ‘Mirror drains’ on the same job connecting to a storm drain….is the storm drain required to grade to it’s discharge point as required in Section 708.1?
Comment:
I would like to get a clarification of a code section. I have a job that we have subsoil drainage (perforated piping) around the perimeter of the building that then ties into a command storm drain line that is no longer a perforated pipe running to a sump pit. My understanding is that once we are conveying the stormwater in a non-perforated pipe that the non-perforated pipe is now a storm drain pipe and must slope to the sump pit.
2. Yes.
2. If a roofing manufacturer states that cants are not recommended with their roofing system, may the cants be justifiably omitted on a controlled flow roof? (I have attached the supporting documentation submitted by the contractor).
Comment:
One of the architects in our plan review group indicated that built up roofing systems always require cants because the base materials will fail with a 90 degree installation, however, single ply membrane roof systems are different and while some may, the majority of manufacturers do not include cant strips in their installation instructions for standard installations.
2. Section 301.2 of the 2012 Uniform Plumbing Code permits the “use of systems, methods or devices of equivalent or superior quality, strength, fire resistance, effectiveness, durability and safety over those prescribed by this code”. This section also gives the Authority Having Jurisdiction the power to approve or disapprove the system or installation depending on the technical documentation of equivalency supplied by the manufacturer.
2. Is groundwater received by foundation draintile considered to be rainwater?
3. If a draintile basin is serving a multi-family apartment building - is that basin considered to be in a "public use" occupancy building?
Comment
Section 1101.13 requires rainwater sumps serving "public use" occupancy buildings to be provided with dual pumps. Section 220.0 defines rainwater as "Natural precipitation that has not been contaminated by use".
2. Yes. Groundwater is water that exists beneath the Earth's surface. It originates as rainfall or snow, and then moves through the soil into the groundwater system, where it remains below grade in aquifers or makes its way back to the surface to streams, rivers or lakes. It is naturally replenished from precipitation or streams and rivers that infiltrate into the ground.
3. No. A multi-family occupancy is considered residential per Table 422.1.
1. Section 1101.13 Rainwater Sumps does not use the term “residential” occupancy, it uses the term “public use” occupancy.
Since there is no “public use” occupancy classification listed in UPC Table 422.1 it is not entirely clear what types of buildings section 1101.13 is intended to apply to.
In consideration, of that wording, and looking at the definitions of “Public or Public Use” and “Private or Private Use” found in UPC section 218.0 - is a drain-tile sump basin which is not located within an individual dwelling unit and which serves a “mixed-use” occupancy apartment building with non-residential occupancies in addition to the residential occupancy considered to be serving a “public use” occupancy building?
Comment:
Many larger buildings are mixed-use occupancy buildings with more than one occupancy classification – so for example, if an apartment building has a large community room and enclosed parking, it could have an assembly occupancy and storage occupancy in addition to the R-2 residential occupancy for the dwelling units.
Looking at the definitions in UPC 218.0, a common underground parking area or common community room serving the apartment
building would not seem to meet the definition of “private use” and would, based on the definition of “public use”, appear to be “public use” spaces. If a mixed occupancy building includes “public use” occupancy spaces, is that building considered to be a “public use” occupancy building when applying section 1101.13?
2. Is Table 1101.11 or Table 1101.7 applicable to the design of a Scupper opening for a Primary Roof Drain configuration?
2. No. The sizing of scuppers, per Section 1101.11.2.1, shall have an opening not less than 4 inches high and have a width equal to the circumference of the roof drain required for the area served.