IAPMO Answers and Analysis

Answers and Analysis

This knowledge base, updated to include the analyses from the 2003 through the most recent editions of the Uniform Plumbing and Mechanical Codes, continues to be a premier source for engineers, inspectors, students, contractors and tradesmen. Questions come from a broad base of users, and answers are informal interpretations of the Codes provided by a committee of code officials and special experts - they are clearly stated and to the point. This updated site combines the most pertinent analyses from the previous manual and presents them together with those based on the most recent publications of the Uniform Codes. This makes the Answers and Analysis database one of the most valuable tools you as a member can access wherever you have an internet connection.

The Answers and Analysis tool makes it easy to search for relevant questions and answers, either based on keywords or specific sections/chapters of the code. To find questions related to specific topics, type in the keyword(s), select the code and the year and click "Search". To search for questions related to a specific section, type the section in the Section field and click "Search". To search a specific chapter or appendix, select either the UPC or UMC Table of Contents, and select the chapter/appendix from the list.

Click to search by UPC Table Of Contents    Click to search by UMC Table Of Contents
Match EXACT search terms
Match ALL search terms
Match ANY search terms
 
Questions matching UPC Chapter 7
95 results
 
UPC 2006 316.1.6 UPC 2009 316.1.6 UPC 2012 705.10.4
Topic: Solvent Cement Plastic Pipe joints
When making a transition joint within a building from ABS DWV to PVC DWV may ABS to PVC transition
solvent cement be used?
No. Section 316.1.6 (2006/2009), 705.10.4 (2012) limits the use of ABS/PVC transition solvent cement to the connection between the building drain and building sewer. In addition, the IAPMO listing for this specific product states:
“Solvent cements to provide a means for joining ABS non-pressure piping systems using a solvent
cemented transition joint, for example, joining an ABS building drain to a PVC sewer system. Such products
are not considered as all purpose ABS-PVC solvent cements that would be used for mixing of ABS &
PVC piping materials nor can such solvent cements be used for joining either material.”
 
UPC 2003 316.1.6 UPC 2006 316.1.6 UPC 2009 316.1.6 UPC 2012 705.10.4
Topic: Solvent Cement Plastic Pipe Joints
The code section states that a solvent cement transition joint between ABS and PVC building drain and building sewer shall be made using a listed transition solvent cement.

Can the listed transition solvent cement be used at other locations to join ABS and PVC?
No. Section 316.1.6 specifically states that “a solvent cement transition joint between ABS and PVC building drain and building sewer shall be made using a listed transition solvent cement”.
All other transitions from ABS to PVC piping shall be made by listed transition couplings that are referenced in Table 14.1

Additionally, the application explanation for a listed ABS/PVC transition glue (see IAPMO listing #4575) states that “ Solvent cements to provide a means for joining ABS non-pressure piping systems using a solvent cemented transition joint, for example, joining an ABS building drain to a PVC sewer system. Such products are not considered as all purpose ABS-PVC solvent cements that would be used for mixing of ABS & PVC piping materials nor can such solvent cements be used for joining either material.”
 
UPC 2003 701.1, see also IS-1 UPC 2006 701.1, see also IS-1 UPC 2009 701.1, see also IS-1 UPC 2012 701.1, see also IS-1
Topic: SDR 35 Pipe Used as a Building Drain
Would PVC Sewer Pipe SDR 35 be allowed as a building drain (under slab) if it were encased in concrete?
It is the opinion of the Code Interpretations Committee that PVC Sewer Pipe SDR 35 is not acceptable as a building drain whether it were encased in concrete or not, since it is not listed for that use and it does not
meet the minimum wall thickness standards required for use within a building.
Section 313.2 (2003/2006/2009) 312.2 (2012) requires that no piping shall be directly embedded in concrete. PVC
Sewer Pipe SDR 35 is listed for use outside of the building.
 
UPC 2003 701.1 UPC 2006 701.1 UPC 2009 701.1 UPC 2012 701.1
Topic: Drainage Piping – Uniform Inner Diameter
Do Sections 701.1 and 701.2 allow for the replacement of a section of damaged drainage pipe with an alternative material, provided the appropriate couplings are used?
Yes, provided that the material complies with Section 701.0 and the interior waterway is of the same diameter, which assures that the drainage system is free of any ledge, shoulder, or reduction of pipe area that
offers an obstruction to flow.
 
UPC 2003 701.1.2 UPC 2006 701.1.2 UPC 2009 701.1.2 UPC 2012 701.1 (2)
Topic: ABS Exposed to Sunlight
1. Please describe the “approved methods,” as described in IS 5, for thermal expansion movement control in ABS DWV underground building sewers.
2. Can ABS DWV be installed exposed on the exterior wall of a building?
1. IS 5 includes thermal expansion requirements as a cautionary measure to warn against excessive lengths and unsuitable environments. Approved methods may be considered broadly covered in IS 5.
Because of its low resistance to abrasion, buried ABS should be placed in a bed of sand, sandy
loam, or similar material containing no clods, rocks, and backfilled with the same type of material to a
depth of at least 12 inches over the pipe while at normal ground temperature. Buried ABS is more
vulnerable to shrinkage stress than expansion problems and should not be covered while warm.
Having low thermal conductivity, in use it normally varies little from ambient temperatures, particularly
when buried, and therefore little movement may be anticipated.
2. Except for vent terminals, IS 5 precludes the installation of ABS DWV in locations which would be
exposed to sunlight, thus installation on the exterior wall of a building is prohibited.
 
UPC 2003 701.1.2 UPC 2006 701.1.2 UPC 2009 701.1.2 UPC 2012 701.1 (2)
Topic: Exposed Plastic Cleanouts
Is it legal to install an exposed plastic, cleanout plug that protrudes through an exterior building wall, such as a sink cleanout?
While IS 5 (ABS Installation Standard) requires special treatment for exposed ABS vents, there appears to be no similar concern for plastic cleanouts. Historically, plastic cleanout plugs have been listed in the
IAPMO Product Listing Directory without any restrictions on their use.
Plastic cleanout plugs are suitable for exterior locations. Plastic cleanout plugs are not suitable for use
in driveways, parking areas, or other traffic paths.
 
UPC 2003 701.2, see also 316.4.1 UPC 2006 701.2, see also 316.4.1 UPC 2009 701.2, see also 316.4.1 UPC 2012 701.2, see also 316.4.1
Topic: joining Dissimilar Piping Materials with the Same Inside Diameters
Does the code prohibit joining of dissimilar piping materials which have comparable inside diameters?
Dissimilar piping materials or fittings which comply with Sections 701.0, 715.2, (2003/2006/2006/2012) 311.5, and 316.4.1 (2003/2006/2009) 310.5 and 315.2 (2012) may be joined, provided the interior waterways are of the same diameter and listed couplings are utilized. This ensures that the drainage system is free of any ledges, shoulder, or reduction of pipe area that offers an obstruction to flow.
 
UPC 2003 703.2 UPC 2006 703.2 UPC 2009 702.3 UPC 2012 702.3
Topic: Fixture Unit Values
If a pump or sump ejector only discharges to the gravity drainage system intermittently for short cycles or short periods of time, do they need to be assigned two (2) fixture units for each gallon per minute of flow?
If the answer to the above is yes, can you explain why?
Yes. Sizing gravity drainlines to accommodate a pressure input involves establishing a formula (two [2] fixture units per gallon) that converts a pressurized input to an equivalent volume of gravity input.
Intermittent discharge lasting but a few seconds may be capable of filling and pressurizing a gravity system
which has not been "oversized" to accommodate high-rate input. “Continuous flow,” in this context, does
not mean forever but, rather, continuous for a period of time sufficient to overload an undersized drainline.
see also 710.5 (2003/2006/2009/2012)
 
UPC 2003 703.2 UPC 2006 703.2 UPC 2009 702.3 UPC 2012 702.3
Topic: Size of Drainage Pipin
Can two fixture units for each gallon per minute (gpm) of flow be used according to Section 703.2 (2003/2006) 702.3 (2009/2012) for sizing traps and downstream drainage piping for indirect wastes that receives pumped discharge from equipment such as, dishwashers, clothes washers, pool filters, back washing devices, condensate pumps, or should Table 7-4 (2003/2006/2009) Table 702.2(b) (2012) be used, even though it states the values listed are for intermittent flows only?
The sanitary waste piping receiving the indirect discharge from commercial dishwashers, clothes washers and similar appliances that expel intermittent waste flow into the drainage system should be sized per
criteria found in Table 7-4 (2003/2006/20009) Table 702.2(b) (2012). The receptor should be of adequate size to prevent splashing or flooding and the corresponding trap size should not exceed limitations set forth in Section 702.0 (2003/2006/2009/2012).
 
UPC 2003 704.2 UPC 2006 704.2 UPC 2009 704.2 UPC 2012 704.2
Topic: Back-to-Back Fixture Connections
Section 704.2 allows two fixtures to be set back-to-back, or side-by-side, provided that each fixture waste separately into an approved double fitting having inlet openings at the same level. Would a double sanitary
tapped tee or a double sanitary tee, if sized correctly, be approved for this use? Would two kitchen
sinks set back-to-back with a 3 inch x 11⁄2 inch double sanitary tapped tee be approved? Would two
showers set back-to-back with a 3 inch x 2 inch double sanitary tee be approved?
Section 704.2 allows fixtures which are set back-to-back to waste separately into “an approved double fixture fitting.” The appropriate fitting for back-to-back trap arms would be a double inlet fitting which is
configured to create a directional flow toward its 60 degree branch inlets at the barrel connection. A sanitary
cross is unacceptable as a fixture fitting which is why the increased size option allowed by Section
706.2 is not included in Section 704.2.
 
UPC 2003 704.3 UPC 2006 704.3 UPC 2009 704.3 UPC 2012 704.3
Topic: Dishwasher Connections
Does this Section 704.3 mean that a dishwashing machine cannot be drained into a properly vented floor sink?
Section 704.3 lists a number of items after which it states “and other similar fixtures.” Unless constructed as part of a “fixture,” dishwashing machines would normally be construed as something other than a fixture.
 
UPC 2003 704.3, see also 807.4 UPC 2006 704.3, see also 807.4 UPC 2009 704.3, see also 807.4 UPC 2012 704.3, see also 807.4
Topic: Indirect Connection
Does a commercial dishwasher require an indirect drain connection?
Most commercial “pass through” dishwashers incorporate an indirect waste in their design. Front-loading dishwashers and glass washers having the same configuration as domestic machines would require installation consistent with the requirements of Section 807.4. Section 704.3 requires commercial dishwashers to be directly connected to the drainage system with the stipulation that an adjacent floor drain be installed upstream of the dishwasher connection
 
UPC 2003 704.3 UPC 2006 704.3 UPC 2009 704.3 UPC 2012 704.3
Topic: Fixture Connections
Is it the intent of Section 704.3 to allow the dishwasher to flow out of the floor drain if there is an obstruction downstream of the dishwasher’s connection to the sanitary sewer?
Yes, the adjacent floor drain required as part of the installation requirements for pot sinks, scullery sinks, commercial dishwashers and silverware washing machines is a “safety” outlet, intended to aid in the
prevention of waste water backing into the fixture or appliance in the event of a stoppage downstream.
 
UPC 2003 704.4.5 UPC 2006 704.4.5 UPC 2009 408.4.5 UPC 2012 402.6.2
Topic: Securing Closet Rings
Section 704.0 (2003/2006/2009/2012) addresses floor flanges. We have been requiring plastic floor flanges to be screwed to the subfloor. Subsection 704.4.3 (2003/2006), 408.4.3 (2009) 402.6.0 (2012) states that they must be screwed or fastened in an approved manner. Some inspectors are requiring these screws to be of brass. Subsection 704.4.5 (2003/2006) 408.4.5 (2009) 402.6.2 (2012) states that closet screws, bolts and washers must be of brass, copper, or equally corrosion resistant material. My question is, do these same materials apply to screws used to secure the flange to the floor or could cadmium or plain steel screws be used?
The purpose of using brass, copper or other approved corrosion resistant screws or bolts to secure fixtures is to minimize the possibility of failure which could cause the fixture to come loose. This applies equally if
the flange is fastened to other materials or fastened directly to the floor. Materials which are not corrosion resistant are not approved for securing flanges.
 
UPC 2003 705.1.9 UPC 2006 705.1.9 UPC 2009 705.1.9 UPC 2012 705.4.2
Topic: Use of Hubless Couplings for Sewage Ejector Discharge Piping
Can a hubless coupling be used on the discharge piping from a sewage ejector?
Yes, hubless couplings may be used on the discharge piping from a sewage ejector. IS 6 (2003/2006/2009/2012) states that hubless cast-iron sanitary systems may be used in any location
where cast-iron soil pipe is acceptable under the UPC. Section 710.7 (2003/2006/2009/2012) states that
drainage systems in connection with sumps and mechanical waste lifting devices shall be installed under
the same requirements as provided for gravity systems. Vitrified clay pipe is the only drainage material listed in Section 701.1 (2003/2006/2009/2012) that is not acceptable on the discharge piping from a sewage ejector (see Section 701.1.3, 2003/2006/2009) 701.1 (3) (2012).
Nonetheless, manufacturer recommendations or limitations are to be considered in every assessment
of appropriate product application.
see also 310.4 (2003/2006/2009) 309.4 (2012)
 
UPC 2003 705.1.9 UPC 2006 705.1.9 UPC 2009 705.1.9 UPC 2012 705.4.2
Topic: Hubless Transition Joints
May hubless couplings be used for transitions between dissimilar materials?
Transition between different types of materials must be made with couplings listed for the specific intended use. Listed couplings are available for transitions between DWV materials.
See also IS 6 (2003/2006/2009/2012) 310.4 (2003/2003/2009) 309.4 (2012)
 
UPC 2003 705.3.1 UPC 2006 705.3.1 UPC 2009 705.3.1 UPC 2012 705.10.1
Topic: Drainage Slip joints
Are access panels necessary when the following connections are utilized? 1. Listed ABS/PVC trap assemblies with no slip joints.
2. All joints are sweated or soldered.
If no slip joints are utilized, access would not be required in either case (see definition of “slip joint” in Section 221.0, 2003/2006/2009).
See also 405.2 (2003), and 404.2 (2006/2009) 402.11 (2012)
 
UPC 2003 706.3 UPC 2006 706.3 UPC 2009 706.3 UPC 2012 706.3
Topic: Use of Quarter Bends
When a 1⁄4 bend is used as the transition fitting from a vertical or horizontal drain to a horizontal drain, is it required that the fitting have a radius equivalent to that of a combination wye and 1⁄8 bend?
Yes, 90 degree changes in direction of drainage piping from vertical to horizontal, and horizontal to horizontal must be made with approved fittings which include two 45 degree 1⁄8 bends, combination 45 degree
wye and 1⁄8 bends, or other approved fittings of equivalent sweep.
Regarding the required equivalent 45 degree sweep, if a 1⁄4 bend is in question, then place two 1⁄8
bends of the same size and material together for comparison.
The 1⁄4 bend fittings are called by different names, depending on the type of material, but the basic
fundamental requirements or guidelines must be adhered to in Sections 706.3 and 706.4.
 
UPC 2003 707.4 UPC 2006 707.4 UPC 2009 707.4 UPC 2012 707.4
Topic: Cleanouts Above the First Floor
1. Does the cleanout exception 3 of Section 707.4 apply only to installations that are above the first floor (building drain level)?
2. Does the same exception apply to cleanouts installed above the first floor (building drain level) sinks
and urinals?
3. Does the term sinks include all the types of sinks that are listed in Table 7-3 (2003/2006/2009)
Table 702.1 (2012)?
1. Yes. 2. Cleanout requirements for horizontal sink and urinal drains apply only to those fixtures at the building drain level.
3. Yes.
 
UPC 2003 707.4 UPC 2006 707.4 UPC 2009 707.4 UPC 2012 707.4
Topic: Cleanouts Required
Are cleanouts required for the lavatories in Figures 1 and 2 below?
A cleanout would not be required for the lavatory in Figure 1 or Figure 2. The definition of a vertical pipe, Section 224.0 states that a vertical pipe is any pipe that is installed at an angle of not
more than 45 degrees with the vertical. Section 707.4, Exception 2 states that cleanouts may be omitted
on a drainage pipe installed on a slope of 72 degrees or less from the vertical angle. Section 707.4,
Exception 1 states that a cleanout may be omitted on a horizontal drain line less than 5 feet in length,
except for sinks and urinals.
 
UPC 2003 707.4 UPC 2006 707.4 UPC 2009 707.4 UPC 2012 707.4
Topic: Cleanouts Required
In Section 707.4, regarding the distance between upper terminal and the lower end of the building drain, is it necessary to install a cleanout for each 100 feet of pipe; providing the stoppage could be reached from
either extremity with a 100 foot sewer auger?
Yes. Section 707.4 requires a cleanout for each 100 feet of pipe. This is so the entire drain line may be cleaned of any stoppages that may occur. A cleanout at the upper terminal may be omitted according to
Section 707.4, Exception 4, if an approved two-way cleanout is installed inside the building wall near the
connection between the building drain and building sewer or installed outside of a building at the lower end
of a building drain and extended to grade. A two-way cleanout could be a substitute for an upper terminal
cleanout, but is not intended to be an alternative to the cleanout required at the 100 foot interval downstream
of the upper terminal cleanout.
 
UPC 2003 707.4 UPC 2006 707.4 UPC 2009 707.4 UPC 2012 707.4
Topic: Cleanouts for Sinks and Urinals
Section 707.4, Exception 1, allows upper terminal cleanouts to be omitted for horizontal waste lines of 5 feet or less in length, except for sink and urinals. Exception 2 allows cleanouts to be omitted on all horizontal
lines with a slope of 72 degrees from vertical or less. Would Exception 2 eliminate the requirement
for cleanouts on sinks and urinal lines?
Yes. Exception 1 and Exception 2 are applied independently
 
UPC 2003 707.4 UPC 2006 707.4 UPC 2009 707.4 UPC 2012 707.4
Topic: Cleanouts for Water Closet Trap Arms
Section 707.4, Exception 1 states that cleanouts may be omitted on a horizontal drainline which is less than 5 feet in length. Does this mean that a water closet drain pipe which runs 6 feet from the fixture to the vent,
and which is located below the first floor of the building, must have a cleanout?
No, unless the trap arm exceeds 135 degrees change of direction. See also Section 1002.3
 
UPC 2003 707.4 UPC 2006 707.4 UPC 2009 707.4 UPC 2012 707.4
Topic: Upper Terminal Cleanout
Can the upper terminal cleanout of an ABS building drain be extended to grade outside of the foundation?
Will you please clarify this in reference to IS 1 and IS 5?
While IS 5 deals only generally with building drainage cleanouts which are normally located within structures, and IS 1 indicates that building sewer cleanout extensions within 12 inches of grade do merit special
consideration, both standards are qualified by general UPC installation requirements covering mechanical
damage, stress or other misuse of the subject materials.
 
UPC 2003 707.4 UPC 2006 707.4 UPC 2009 707.4 UPC 2012 707.4
Topic: Cleanouts Required
1. Section 707.4 Exception 3 states that cleanouts are not required above the first floor of the building. Does this mean that horizontal changes in direction exceeding 135 degrees above the first floor and
cleanouts are not required?
2. Section 707.5 states that additional cleanouts shall be required when the aggregate horizontal change
of direction exceeds 135 degrees. Does this apply to the ground floor only, first floor only, or does it
apply to all floors?
Note: Most contractors and journeymen believe that Section 707.4 clearly doesn't require cleanouts above
the first floor. I have always required additional cleanouts on all floors when the horizontal change of direction
exceeds 135 degrees.
Exception 3 of Section 707.4 allows horizontal piping other than the "building drain" to be installed without cleanouts. The building drain is defined in Section 204.0 , as "that part of the lowest
piping of a drainage system, etc." The lowest piping would be the horizontal drainline serving all stacks and
branch lines, which comprise the plumbing system of a building, including horizontal branches serving
levels above the first floor.
Note: The lowest horizontal drainline will not necessarily be at grade level. However, it will be the lowest
level that gravity drains to the building sewer.
 
UPC 2003 707.4 UPC 2006 707.4 UPC 2009 707.4 UPC 2012 707.4
Topic: Location of Cleanout
What is the definition for upper terminal?
"Upper terminal" can be defined as follows: "terminal" means "a part that forms the end" (Webster's Ninth Collegiate Dictionary); "upper" means "higher in physical position". Therefore, "upper terminal" would mean
"the end that is higher in physical position." Because drainlines are graded downward from the point of
entry, each branch and each trunkline will have a high and a low end, the high end being the "upper
terminal."
 
UPC 2003 707.4 UPC 2006 707.4 UPC 2009 707.4 UPC 2012 707.4
Topic: Cleanouts
Can a wye and 1⁄8 bend that is installed on its back opposing another wye and 1⁄8 bend that is installed on its back be used for cleanouts for building sewer and building drain that is located outside of the building?
No. Section 707.4(4) allows an approved type of two-way fitting (singular) to be installed inside the building wall or outside of the building at the lower end of the building drain and extended to grade. This language suggests that the Code recognizes the use of a single fitting designed for this purpose as opposed to an assembly of fittings that are attached in a back-to-back configuration.
 
UPC 2003 707.5 UPC 2006 707.5 UPC 2009 707.4 UPC 2012 707.4
Topic: Cleanout Location for Change of Direction
In applying Section 707.5,(2003/2006) 707.4 (2009/2012) how are the total degrees of changes in direction in a horizontal branch calculated
from start to finish before an additional cleanout is required? Are the fittings on the main building drain
included in the count?
Early editions of the UPC required a cleanout for each horizontal change of direction in excess of 221⁄2 degrees. Later editions permitted up to one 45 degree offset (two 45 degree changes of direction) without
an additional cleanout. The current UPC permits an aggregate 135 degree change of direction without an
additional cleanout and without specifying the fitting angles, provided that they conform to Section 706.0.
Traditionally, cleanout requirements start at the upper terminal of a drain and continue at 100 foot intervals
thereafter on straight lines.
In the past, the intersection of a branch with a building drain did not require another cleanout, providing
it was accomplished by means of a wye or combination wye and 1⁄8 bend fitting. The addition of the two 45
degree changes of direction between its upper terminal cleanout and its normal intersection with another
drain did not previously require an extra cleanout for change of direction. Considering the interim development of more sophisticated drain cleaning tools and the changing character of wastes, no additional
cleanout fitting is mandated by the UPC until the aggregate change of direction between the upper terminal
cleanout and the branch fitting on the receiving drain exceeds 135 degrees. This opinion also applies to
changes in direction in qualifying drains not over five feet in length.
 
UPC 2003 707.5 UPC 2006 707.5 UPC 2009 707.4 UPC 2012 707.4
Topic: Cleanouts – Change of Direction for Branch Fitting Connections
In calculating the total degrees of change of direction regarding cleanouts, is it correct to include the degrees of change of direction at the point where a branch line intersects with another line?
If a horizontal drainage line that is provided with a cleanout is intersected by a wye fitting for a branch connection, the 45 degree change of direction in the wye is not included in determining the change of direction of the branch regarding cleanout requirements (see Figure 1 below).
If a horizontal drainage line that is provided with a cleanout is intersected by a combination wye and
1⁄8 bend fitting for a branch connection, only 45 degrees or the 1⁄8 bend portion of the fitting is included in
determining the change of direction of the branch regarding cleanout requirements (see Figure 2 below).
Changes of direction in any branch line are considered only until they intersect another horizontal
drainage line that is provided with an appropriately sized cleanout.
 
UPC 2003 707.5 UPC 2006 707.5 UPC 2009 707.4 UPC 2012 707.4
Topic: Cleanouts
When determining the "Aggregate Horizontal change in Direction", for drainage pipe. Would a 90 degree fitting be counted at the horizontal to vertical transition if the cleanout is provided on the vertical vent
section?
No, a 90 degree change in direction from horizontal to vertical would not be added to the horizontal change in direction. A cleanout is only required whenever there is a “horizontal change in direction exceeding one
hundred and thirty-five degrees”.
 
UPC 2003 707.7 UPC 2006 707.7 UPC 2009 707.6 UPC 2012 707.6
Topic: Cleanout Extension
Please explain what is meant by a wye-type fitting in Section 707.7 and reconcile this with Section 706.2 which permits a horizontal drainage line to connect to a vertical drainage line by way of a sanitary tee.
The flow of waste in horizontal drainage piping is dependent on three major factors: adequate slope, reasonably smooth piping, and the proper use of directional fittings having sufficient sweep. To properly
serve their purpose, cleanout extensions and their incidental fittings must also be directional and of a radius
large enough to avoid abrupt turns and thus facilitate the manipulation of drain cleaning tools.
For the purpose of clarifying Section 707.7 (2003/2006) 707.6 (2009/2012) which stipulates that cleanout extensions must be considered as drainage piping and prescribes the configuration of fittings used, a wye-type fitting is any approved fitting embodying a change of direction not greater than a 45 degree angle. This also includes a 90 degree fitting having a sufficient radius to produce cleaning tool access characteristics equivalent to the combination of a 45 degree wye and 1⁄8 bend or two 1⁄8 bends.
A tapped cleanout tee or a sanitary tee are acceptable as direct points of entry for cleaning tools.
Neither of these would be permissible when a branch extension is necessary.
Where a stack also serves as a horizontal cleanout entry point, a branch extending from a sanitary tee
on such stack is not an acceptable extension.
See also 706.2 (2003/2006/2009/2012)
 
UPC 2003 707.9 UPC 2006 707.9 UPC 2009 707.8 UPC 2012 707.8
Topic: Cleanout Accessibility
Does a cleanout, located inside a cabinet and which requires opening the hinged cabinet door and removing a drawer, meet the accessibility requirements of Section 707.9 (2003/2006) 707.8 (2009/2012)?
Yes, as defined in Section 203.0 of the UPC, “Readily accessible means direct access without the necessity of removing any panel, door, or similar obstruction”. Opening a cabinet door is considered readily
accessible.
See also 707.10 (2003/2006), 707.9 (2009/2012)
 
UPC 2003 707.1 UPC 2006 707.1 UPC 2009 707.1 UPC 2012 707.1
Topic: Cleanouts Required
1. With a 4 inch horizontal drain, can I install a 3 inch cleanout fitting with a 3-1/2 inch plug? 2. On a 2 inch drain line, can I install a 1-1/2 inch cleanout fitting with a 1-1/2 inch plug on a 1-1/2 inch
vent?
1. No. 2. Yes. Table 7-6 (2003/2006/2009) Table 707.1 (2012) establishes the minimum size of cleanout opening based on the pipe size served. The cleanout opening should be appropriately sized to access the drainage pipe served.
 
UPC 2003 707.11 UPC 2006 707.11 UPC 2009 707.1 UPC 2012 707.1
Topic: Cleanouts for Wet Vent Installations
1. When a vertical wet vent installation is used for a single family residence, how should the cleanout be installed?
2. Is removal of the water closet an acceptable means to clean out the building drainage line (see drawing
below)?
1. Assuming the 3 inch horizontal drainage piping is provided with the required cleanouts upstream of the bathroom, no additional cleanouts would be required for the wet vent installation as per the proposed
drawing below. Section 707.0 applies to horizontal drainage piping only. Section 1002.3 provides the
cleanout requirements for trap arms.
2. No. The removal of the water closet is not an acceptable means or alternative method to clean out the
building drainage line.
 
UPC 2003 710.1 UPC 2006 710.1 UPC 2009 710.1 UPC 2012 710.1
Topic: Sewer Backwater Valve Location
Referring to Section 710.1, why is sewer backwater valve protection limited to fixtures below the next upstream manhole cover of the public sewer? Why is the choice of protecting all fixtures with a single backwater valve not optional?
The last clause in Section 710.1 is intended to fix placement of necessary backwater valves at locations where their closure will cause minimum disruption in drainage system function.
Connecting the upper level fixtures on the “house” side of the backwater valve would allow flooding of
the lower level fixtures when any surcharge on the server main causes closure of the backwater valve.
Connecting the fixtures downstream of the backwater valve prevents this from occurring.
See also Section 710.6
 
UPC 2003 710.1 UPC 2006 710.1 UPC 2009 710.1 UPC 2012 710.1
Topic: Sewer Backwater Valves
1. If a building has two or more floors, and each floor has fixtures with their overflow rims below the next upstream manhole cover, does each floor have to drain through its own backwater valve so that
flooding will not occur on the lower floors if the lower backwater valve should fail or become plugged?
2. Is the intent of the last sentence in Section 710.1 to prevent property damage to the lower floors that
is caused by the upper floors, even if the upper floor is below the next upstream manhole cover?
1. No. 2. The intent of Section 710.1 is to protect the building interior from main-line sewer overflow or surcharge.
 
UPC 2003 710.1 UPC 2006 710.1 UPC 2009 710.1 UPC 2012 710.1
Topic: Fixtures Located Below the Next Manhole
Section 710.1 indicates that any fixtures below the next upstream manhole shall be run through a backwater valve. Is a backwater valve required if the building sewer goes directly into a manhole and the manhole lid is
below the fixture rim but the next upstream manhole is above the fixture rim?
No. A backwater valve would not be required because the next upstream manhole in this case would be the one that is connected to the building sewer. Please note that the code requires the floor that the fixtures
are set above the next upstream manhole, not just above the fixtures' rim.
 
UPC 2003 710.1 UPC 2006 710.1 UPC 2009 710.1 UPC 2012 710.1
Topic: Size of Vent
A single-story dwelling is equipped with a backwater valve due to the provisions of Section 710.1. All of the building drains discharge through the backflow valve and into a public sewer. Assuming each trap arm is
vented correctly in the conventional manner, is it the intent of Section 904.1 to require additional venting to
be installed on the discharge side of the backwater valve?
Yes, additional venting would be needed downstream of the backwater valve to comply with Section 904.1 (2003/2006/2009/2012) and Section 901.0 (2003/2006/2009/2012) that requires air circulation throughout the entire drainage system, which includes the building sewer.
 
UPC 2003 710.3.3 UPC 2006 710.3.3 UPC 2009 710.3.3 UPC 2012 710.3(3)
Topic: Ejector Pipe Size
For the requirements of a 3 inch public sewage ejector discharge, is it the intent of Section 710.3.3 to include the backwater valve and gate valve; or is it the intent that the 3 inch discharge be upstream of the
gate and backwater valve, where both lines connect and the load of both pumps meet?
Section 710.3.3 stipulates that the discharge piping of “each” ejector or pump shall have a backwater and gate valve, and be a minimum of 3 inches in diameter. When stripped of extraneous wording this section
says: "Each pump or ejector shall have a backwater valve, a gate valve, and shall have piping which is a
minimum of 3 inches."
 
UPC 2003 710.6 UPC 2006 710.6 UPC 2009 710.6 UPC 2012 710.6
Topic: Backwater Valves
Can a listed plastic, backwater valve and a listed plastic, fullway ball valve be installed in a drainage system?
Fullway ball valves are allowed to be installed in a drainage system. A listed plastic, backwater valve or fullway ball valve would be allowed where a plastic drainage system is permitted
See also Section 710.4
 
UPC 2003 710.9 UPC 2006 710.9 UPC 2009 710.9 UPC 2012 710.9
Topic: Sewage Ejectors
In reference to Sections 218.0 and 710.9, would the pump for a sewage ejector in a duplex be considered public or private? This question is for the purpose of using a dual pump system.
Section 218.0 defines a private system as one which serves a “family or an individual.” Therefore, any system of piping, fixtures, or a sump which serves two or more families is considered to be public use .
Since Section 710.9 requires dual sewage pumps or ejectors for public use occupancies, dual pumps
are required for a duplex.
See also 218.0, Public or Private Use and Public or Public Use
 
UPC 2003 710.9 UPC 2006 710.9 UPC 2009 710.9 UPC 2012 710.9
Topic: Sewage Ejectors
Does Section 710.9 require dual pumps or ejectors when only one fixture is drained into the sump or receiving tank in a “public use” occupancy?
Yes. Section 710.9 makes no exceptions for providing dual pumping capacity, including when the plumbing system served is comprised of a single fixture.
 
UPC 2003 710.9 UPC 2006 710.9 UPC 2009 710.9 UPC 2012 710.9
Topic: Drainage of Fixture
Regarding UPC 710.9, this section appears to refer to two situations: (1) to all such sumps and receiving tanks, and (2) to the specific situation of those in any "public use" occupancy. The first sentence of the section is clear. With respect to audio and visual alarms, does the second sentence of this section refer only to those sumps and receiving tanks in a "public use" occupancy? Also, regarding the 2 inch minimum clearance between the lowest level of the inlet and the turn-on level of the pumps, does the third sentence of this section refer only to those sumps and receiving tanks in a "public use" occupancy?
Section 710.9 refers to all sumps and receiving tanks for public and private use, and includes the additional requirements for public use occupancies to have dual pumps. All other requirements refer to sump installations, public and private use.
 
UPC 2003 710.1 UPC 2006 710.1 UPC 2009 710.1 UPC 2012 710.1
Topic: Sewer Ejector Vents
Regarding the requirements of Section 710.10, if a sewer ejector is required, can the vent on the ejector be combined with other vents?
Section 710.10 allows vent pipes from sumps or receiving tanks with approved type, electrically operated sewer ejectors to be combined with other vent pipes or to go separately through the roof.
Vent pipes from air operated sewer ejectors are not permitted to combine with other vents. Since air
operated sewer ejectors are seldom used, the common practice is to use the electrical type, and to
combine the sump vent with the venting system of the building. This is especially true in hi-rise construction
where running a vent through the roof would be costly and impractical.
The size of the vent from the sump and the point where it combines with the building system should
be calculated per Section 710.10. In addition, Section 811.6 (2003/2006/2009/2012) would prohibit combining
chemical vents with other sanitary vents.
 
UPC 2003 712.1 UPC 2006 712.1 UPC 2009 712.1 UPC 2012 712.1
Topic: Air Testing Plastic Pipe
Is air testing prohibited for plastic DWV pipe and fittings in the roof drainage system and for plastic DWV pipe and fittings in the sanitary drainage system?
Yes. Section 1109.2.2 does not allow Schedule 40 plastic DWV systems to be tested by air. Section 712.1 also prohibits air from being used as a test media for plastic pipe.
see also 1109.2 (2009/2012) 1109.2.2 (2003/2006)
 
UPC 2003 712.2 UPC 2006 712.2 UPC 2009 712.2 UPC 2012 712.2
Topic: Testing DWV Systems
Is the intent of Section 712.2 to achieve a minimum test pressure of 5 psi throughout a DWV system? Can this pressure be obtained in an under-slab system if all the branch lines are capped and then filled with
water, which traps air in the branch lines?
Section 712.0 (2003/2006/2009/2012) allows DWV piping installation to be tested with either water pressure (10 foot head) or air pressure (5 psi). A 10 foot head of water exerts 4.34 psi of test pressure at the base of the 10 foot column of water. Therefore, the water and air pressures are similar enough to be accepted as equivalent.
Both of the air and water tests exert comparable pressures when testing a DWV system. A combination
of air and water does not increase the pressure of either. The air test requires sealing the system and
attaching an air compressor testing apparatus which forces air pressure into the system until there is a
uniform gauge pressure of 5 psi to measure pressure loss if a leak should exist. The water test requires
totally filling the system with water under a 10 foot head of pressure to visually expose material or installation
defects. Any test which fails to satisfy all the criteria for either method would not be code compliant
 
UPC 2003 714.1 UPC 2006 714.1 UPC 2009 714.1 UPC 2012 714.1
Topic: Sewer Damage from Floor Drains in Garages
What is the intent of Sections 306.1 and 714.1 regarding floor drains installed in garages. Is it illegal to allow material and liquids which may be harmful to the drainage and sewer system or do we prohibit floor
drains in garages?
If it is illegal to allow various materials and liquids to be introduced into the drainage system, then we
should not allow floor drains in garages in any case.
The intent of Sections 306.1 (2003/2006/2009) 305.1 (2012) and 714.1 is to prevent damage to the drainage and sewer system by the discharge of other than domestic sewage.
Damage to the drainage system can be avoided by the proper use of an interceptor (clarifier) as
required by Section 1009.0.(2003/2006/2009/2012)
Floor drains in auto repair garages, car washes, photo labs, which could use products which would be
harmful to the drainage and sewer system must be required to drain into an industrial interceptor (clarifier)
before being discharged into a public or private sewer system.
 
UPC 2003 715.2 UPC 2006 715.2 UPC 2009 715.2 UPC 2012 715.2
Topic: ABS to PVC Plastic Transition Glue
IAPMO lists a glue which can be used for ABS to PVC transitions. One of the terms of the listing is a requirement that the glue be used at the transition between the building drain and the building sewer. Does
this listing and the definitions of building drain and building sewer prohibit the use of this glue for a single
ABS to PVC transition that occurs more than two feet outside the building? If not, how far from the building
could one reasonably make this transition without compromising the listing requirement?
No, the transition may be made at any point beyond the minimum 2 foot requirement for a building drain transition to the building sewer.
There is no specific limit to the distance beyond the end of the building drain that this transition connection
for ABS to PVC may be permitted.
See also 316.1.6 (2003/2006/2009) 705.10.4 (2012)
 
UPC 2003 719.1 UPC 2006 719.1 UPC 2009 719.1 UPC 2012 719.1
Topic: Cleanouts on Force Main Sewer Systems
Are cleanouts required for a force main sewer system installed on-site?
Taken literally, the referenced code sections would require cleanouts at the prescribed intervals.However, Section 301.2.1 (2003) 301.2 (2006/2009/2012) addresses 'intent,' and emphasizes that the UPC
does not prohibit applying alternatives which result in equivalent outcomes. In each non-standard plumbing
system design, such as a pressure drainage system, there are variables that need to be considered and
addressed. The length of the system, the total rise, the length of the no-flow periods, the waste contents,
the discharge flow velocity, the head pressure capacity of the pumps, and the number of directional
changes in the discharge piping are but a few of the considerations that make each of these systems
unique. Normally, there are solids suspended in waste water which contributes to the possibility of the low
end of the system becoming more solid than liquid. With sufficient elevation to compress these solids and
a period of time for this mass to congeal, it is possible to create an obstruction which would not be easily
moved. Infrequent pump discharge due to a reduction in use of one or more buildings may also result in
contents which do not freely move within the system. A number of variables make design of such systems
more difficult than those associated with designing a water pumping station; and because no one can accurately predict system utilization over the long term, it is best to take a conservative approach. This would
include installing cleanouts at strategic locations.
Cleanout openings for pressure piping are unique when compared with those for gravity systems. Each
pressure system cleanout opening requires a fullway valve and an adapter connection which allows attachment of either a pressure hose or a suction hose. In no instance is a conventional manhole of any value
when installing a pressure discharge waste system. Because the method of clearing stoppages does not
normally involve the use of a 100 foot long tool, the need for providing cleanouts at 100 foot intervals is
subject to joint discretion of the designer and the Authority Having Jurisdiction.
In summary, the 'intent' of Section 707.12 must be satisfied as, in any event, an extensive pressure
drainage system should not be installed without some means of access other than its inlet and outlet openings.
See also 707.12, 710.7 and 719.6 (2003/2006/2009/2012)
 
UPC 2003 710.1 UPC 2009 710.1 UPC 2012 710.1
Topic: Backflow Protection (Sanitary Sewer)
Are buildings located where the finished floor elevation is lower than buildings located upstream on a public or private sewer line, which does not contain a manhole required to be protected by backwater valves? Section 710.1 of the UPC requires a backwater valve in these situations only when the next upstream manhole is located at a higher elevation than the floor of the building in question. There are times when the danger of sewer backflow exists, but there is no upstream manhole.
Yes. Even though there is no up-stream manhole, a blockage could happen down-stream and cause a back-up in to the sewer services that are lower than the up-stream services. Normally manholes, which could overflow and prevent sewerage from backing up into the lower services, are installed as cleanout access points on public or private sewer mains. Though this is not the case in this situation, the potential for damage still exists thereby creating the need for the installation of a backwater valve.
 
UPC 2009 316.1.6 UPC 2012 IS 9-2006 2.1.4.1; 705.7.2 UPC 2015 705.5.2
Topic: Solvent Cement
Does IAPMO/UPC recognize "clear" Primer that meets ASTM F656 as being code compliant with the purple primer color requirement in 705.7.2 and IS 9-2006 Section 2.3.4.1?
Primers that meet ASTM F656 must be purple in color in order to be in compliance with Section 316.1.6 (2009), 705.7.2 (2012 UPC), 705.5.2 (2015) and as noted in the IS 9-2006 2.1.4.1. The purple coloring is the only means that allows the owners, installers and the inspectors to verify that required listed primers were applied.
Code changes have been proposed in recent code cycles to permit primer tinted purple, but that can only be seen by the use of a UV light. To our knowledge this code change has not been approved because many code compliance departments do not want to equip their inspectors with UV detecting equipment.
 
UPC 2009 707.11 UPC 2012 707.11 UPC 2015 707.11
Topic: Cleanouts for Pressure Drainage
Are cleanouts required on pressure drainage systems?
The code does require that cleanouts shall be provided for pressure drainage systems in section 707.11 and in section 710.7 it states that they should be installed under the same requirements as a gravity system.
 
UPC 2009 404.3 UPC 2012 405.2 UPC 2015 701.4
Topic: 3-Compartment Sink
Would a 1 1/2" double tee be allowed to combine the three compartments of a three compartment sink?
A three compartment sink is a single fixture and the connections between the individual compartments are by definition a continuous waste. The code does not have specific requirements for the type of fittings that may be used on a continuous waste, although the Code does require a wye or other directional type fitting when a disposal unit is connected to the continuous waste. Although there may not be a specific requirement the committee feels that a double fixture fitting or a double combination makes a better installation. For the requirements in your area contact the AHJ to find out their requirements.
 
UPC 2009 706.3 UPC 2012 706.3 UPC 2015 706.3
Topic: Horizontal to Horizontal Change of Direction
When making a 90° change of direction in a horizontal drain line, what is the minimum radius fitting required when using schedule 40 PVC DWV fittings?
Does Section 706.3 allow the use of 2 -1/8th bends, a regular 1/4 bend, or a long turn 1/4 bend?
Schedule 40 PVC DWV long sweeps and 1/8th bends with a minimum radian of 0.79 are the proper fittings to use on a horizontal to horizontal change of direction in a drain line. The use of a quarter bend is not allowed due to the fact that the abrupt change in direction will reduce the velocity of the flow.
 
UPC 2009 707.4 UPC 2012 707.4 UPC 2015 707.4
Topic: Floor Sink
In Section 707.4, is a floor sink considered a "sink" and does it require a properly sized cleanout on the horizontal drain line if less than 5 feet off the main?
A floor sink is considered an indirect waste receptor, not a sink, and as such would not be required by Section 707.4 to have a cleanout if the horizontal waste line for the fixture is less than 5 feet from the main building drain.
 
UPC 2006 1101.5.3 UPC 2012 709.1, 1101.5.2 UPC 2015 1101.14
Topic: Sump Pumps for storm water
2015 UPC Section 1101.14 does not address where sumps for rainwater systems are allowed. Is it allowable for a designer to choose to discharge rainwater roof drains into a sump with a pump, even if it is possible for it to drain by gravity?
Comment
2015 UPC section 709.1, section 710.2, and section 1101.6.2 state that the systems shall be designed to be drained by gravity where possible and practicable but Section 1101.14 does not address this issue for rainwater drains.
No. If the Rainwater leaders and conductors can go by gravity then they must go by gravity. If a power outage were to occur during a rain storm, disabling the sump, the rainwater would quickly backup to the roof and could cause overloading of the roof system. There are unique situations that won’t allow them to go by gravity and therefor you must comply with section 1101.14. If the building is for public use than you must install a dual pump similar to the requirements as an ejector system for sanitary drainage.
 
UPC 2015 707.4
Topic: Cleanouts
Section 707.4 Exception 3 states, cleanouts are not required above the first floor of the building.

1. Does this mean that cleanouts are not required for any horizontal drainpipes above the first floor?

2. Does this apply to the ground floor only, first floor only, or does it apply to all floors?
1. Yes. Cleanouts may be omitted on drain lines that are above the floor level of the lowest floor of the building and above the building drain, which is usually the first floor of a building, with two exceptions. 1. A cleanout shall be installed above the fixture connection fitting, serving each urinal, regardless of the location of the urinal in the building, and 2. Section 1002.3 requires cleanouts on trap arms that exceeds 90 degrees change in direction.
2. Cleanouts are required for drains below the lowest floor of the building, which could be a basement, and on the building drain and its branches which is normally below the first or ground floor of a building.
 
UPC 2006 710.3.3 & 710.12 UPC 2012 710.3(3) & 710.12 UPC 2015 710.3(3) & 710.12
Topic: Sewage Ejectors and Pumps
1. Does the Wording of 710.3.3 "... capable of passing a 2 inch diameter solid ball ..." actually mean a 2” ball must be able to pass through the pump mechanism without damage?

Comment:
From our research most sewage ejectors have a discharge pump known as a “grinder”. As such, we are concerned that the language, as our local health department is interpreting it, is stating a 2” solid ball must be able to pass through the pump itself with no damage.

2. Is it the intent of the code in these sections to prohibit "Grinder Pumps" in a Sewage Ejector or Pump??
1. Yes, a standard sewage ejector pump is required to be capable of passing an 1-1/2” solid ball on residential pumps and 2” on units installed commercially.
2. No. Grinder pumps are part of the sewage ejector pump family and may be used in lieu of a standard sewage ejector pump. The requirements for grinder pumps may be found in Section 710.12 of the 2012 UPC.
 
UPC 2006 710.1 UPC 2012 710.1, 901.1 UPC 2015 710.1, 901.2
Topic: Backwater valves
Section 710.1 states that a backwater valve is required for fixtures on floor levels below the next upstream manhole covers. In our jurisdiction it has generally been accepted that we may install a backwater device in these conditions, but that all drainage (from all floors) is allowed to run through that backwater device. Is this piping configuration compliant with the Uniform Plumbing Code?
Per Section 710.1 of the UPC, only fixtures installed on a floor level below the next upstream manhole cover shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved backwater valve. All fixtures on floor levels above the aforementioned elevation shall be connected downstream of the backwater valve. Connecting the upper floor drainage piping to the building drain prior to the backwater valve will allow waste water from those fixtures to back out of the lower fixtures when the backwater valve is in a closed position. Additionally the Code requires all of the drainage system to be vented. A backwater valve in the sewer would prevent the sewer from being vented as required.
 
UPC 2006 707.4(4), 707.5 UPC 2012 707.4(4), 707.5 UPC 2015 707.4(4), 707.5
Topic: Two way cleanouts
I have a question about approved 2 way cleanouts.

I have included 2 pictures both which are claimed to be approved. 1. Can you confirm both patterns are approved?

2. Are either ok to use from the house to the inlet of the septic tank?

Comment:
707.4 Exception 4
An approved type of two-way cleanout fitting, installed inside the building wall near the connection between the building drain and the building sewer or installed outside of a building at the lower end of a building drain and extended to grade, shall be permitted to be substituted for an upper terminal cleanout.

707.5 Each cleanout shall be installed so that it opens to allow cleaning in the direction of flow of the soil or waste or at right angles thereto and, except in the case of wye branch and end-of-line cleanouts, shall be installed vertically above the flow line of the pipe
1. The double wye installation is a field made type of cleanout and would be required to be approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction. The two-way cleanout is a UPC approved and IAPMO listed fitting and is approved for installation.
2. The listed two-way cleanout is UPC approved and listed and may be installed in that application. The double wye configuration would require AHJ approval prior to installation.

Note: Section 707.5 of the UPC specifically states: “Each cleanout shall be installed so that it opens to allow cleaning in the direction of flow of the soil or waste or at right angles thereto and, except in the case of wye branch and end-of-line cleanouts, shall be installed vertically above the flow line of the pipe.” These are the requirements for the installation of cleanouts regardless of the depth of the sanitary sewer.
Image 1 Image 2
 
UPC 2006 704.3 UPC 2009 704.3 UPC 2012 704.3 UPC 2015 704.3 UPC 2018 704.3
Topic: Commercial Sinks
1. Can a floor sink be substituted for the floor drain required in this section?
Yes. The floor drain installed per Section 704.3 of Uniform Plumbing Code, is to provide a level of protection for pot sinks, scullery sinks, dishwashing sinks and similar fixtures, by providing an opening in the drainage system lower than that of the sink, thereby preventing sanitary waste from backing into the sink in the event of a stoppage. Nothing in the code precludes the use of a floor sink in lieu of a floor drain in this type of installation.
 
UPC 2009 715.3 UPC 2012 701.2, Table 701.2, 715.3 UPC 2015 701.2, Table 701.2, 715.3 UPC 2018 701.2, Table 701.2, 715.3
Topic: Drainage Piping
Can HDPE pipe SDR 17 trenchless methodology be used for a Building Drain replacement?
Table 701.2 of the Uniform Plumbing Code, limits the use of polyethylene pipe and fittings for building sewers*.

*Note: A building sewer is defined as “That part of the horizontal piping of a drainage system that extends from the end of the building drain and that receives the discharge of the building drain and conveys it to a public sewer, private sewer, private sewage disposal system, or other point of disposal”.
 
UPC 2009 712.1 UPC 2012 712.1 UPC 2015 712.1 UPC 2018 712.1
Topic: Testing
The last sentence of section 712.1 says, "After the plumbing fixtures have been set and their traps filled with water, they shall be submitted to a final test."
Can you please clarify what the ‘final test’ is?
Per Section 105.0 of the Uniform Plumbing Code, the entire plumbing system is required to be tested with air or water and inspected prior to covering or concealing the piping. Testing requirements for specific piping systems may be found throughout the Code. Section 712.0, addresses the testing of drainage and venting systems. Once the piping has been tested, it would be redundant to retest the system once the fixtures are set and the job is complete. The final test referenced in Section 712.1 is simply the visual verification that the fixtures are listed as prescribed in the Code, installed per the requirements of the manufacturer and the Code and do not leak.
 
UPC 2012 715.3 UPC 2015 715.3 UPC 2018 715.3
Topic: Existing Sewers
1. Does this section apply to building drain, waste and vent?

2. Can "Cured in Place Piping" be used for patching or repair of waste and vent lines in buildings?
1. No. Section 715.3 of the Uniform Plumbing Code refers to the trenchless repair of existing building sewers* using resin impregnated tube per ASTM F1216-16 (Standard Practice for Rehabilitation of Existing Pipelines and Conduits by the Inversion and Curing of a Resin-Impregnated Tube). The scope of that standard states that this process may be used in the reconstruction process for a variety of gravity and pressure applications, such as sanitary sewers, storm sewers, process piping, electrical conduits and ventilation systems.
2. No. Per Section 309.2 it is unlawful to conceal cracks, holes or other imperfections by welding, brazing, soldering, paint, wax, solvent cement or other leak-sealing or repair agents. Damaged pipe and fittings must be replaced with code compliant material.

*Building Sewer. That part of the horizontal piping of a drainage system that extends from the end of the building drain and that receives the discharge of the building drain and conveys it to a public sewer, private sewer, private sewage disposal system, or other point of disposal.
 
UPC 2015 705.2.2 UPC 2018 701.2(5), 705.2.2
Topic: Drainage Pipe (Stainless Steel 304)
Would a hubless coupling, whose shield is made of 304 SS, installed underground meet all codes?
Yes. Section 701.2(5) of the 2018 Uniform Plumbing Code, pertains specifically to the installation of stainless steel pipe and fittings. Listed shielded couplings are required to meet Section 705.2.2, which requires the couplings to comply with ASTM A1056, ASTM C1277-18, ASTM C1540 or CISPI 310. All of these standards but ASTM A1056 pertain to stainless steel shielded couplings. None of these standards limit where the couplings may be installed. Additionally, each of the aforementioned standards require a minimum 300 series stainless steel for the coupling* and make references to CISPI 310, which states in its General Information section, “the 300 series stainless steel was selected for the clamp and shield assemblies because it possesses high corrosion resistant characteristics, which have been demonstrated to exist in underground corrosion tests conducted by the U.S. Department of Commerce through the National Bureau of Standards.”

*ASTM C1277-2015 6.1.1 All parts shall be of 300 series stainless steel. All parts made from round stock shall be of 300 series stainless steel.

ASTM C1540 6.1.1 All metallic parts shall be of 300 series stainless steel and shall conform to the requirements of Specification A240/A240M. All metallic parts made from round stock shall be of 300 series stainless steel and shall conform to the requirements of Specification A493 (excluding copper-bearing alloys).

CISPI 310 2.3 Shield and Clamp Assembly. The shield and clamp assembly shall consist of (1) a 300 Series stainless steel corrugated shield, (2) two stainless steel bands for sizes 1 ½”, 2”, 3”, and 4”, (see Fig. 1.); four stainless steel bands for sizes 5”, 6”, 8” and 10”, (see Fig. 2.); six stainless steel bands for sizes 12” and 15” (see Fig. 3.) and (3) a stainless steel tightening device for each band. Each tightening device housing shall interlock with a band at the unslotted end. The bands are to be fastened to the shield by riveting or such other method that shall insure that the bands shall not become separated from the shield. The shield and clamp assembly shall comply with dimension and material specifications, as are given in Tables 4, 5, and 5A.
 
UPC 2006 707.4 Exception 3 UPC 2009 707.4 Exception 3 UPC 2012 707.4 Exception 3 UPC 2015 707.4 Exception 3 UPC 2018 707.4 Exception 3
Topic: Cleanouts above the lowest floor of the building
Is a clean out required on a sink regardless of location, such as sinks on levels above the lowest floor?

Comment:
(3) Cleanouts above Excepting the building drain, its horizontal branches, and urinals, a cleanout shall not be required on a pipe or piping that is above the floor level of the lowest floor of the building.
No. Exception 3 in Section 707.4 of the 2015/2018 Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) states that cleanouts are only required on the building drain*, the horizontal branches connected to the building drain and urinals. Other than urinals, no other cleanouts are required on piping above the elevation of the building drain.

* Building Drain. That part of the lowest piping of a drainage system that receives the discharge from soil, waste, and other drainage pipes inside the walls of the building and conveys it to the building sewer beginning 2 feet (610 mm) outside the building wall.
 
UPC 2006 710.3.3, 710.9 UPC 2009 710.3.3, 710.9 UPC 2012 710.3, 710.9 UPC 2015 710.3, 710.9 UPC 2018 710.3 and 710.9
Topic: Sewage Ejector and Pumps
Are dual pump sewage ejectors systems (with an alarm) required in a commercial installation serving only a 3 compartment sink and grease interceptor?

Comment: Installer is proposing a single ejector pump system to lift the discharge from the fixtures shown above, 10 feet to a gravity building drain. If this commercial building is considered ‘public use’ occupancy we believe section 710.9 would apply.
No. Section 710.3 of the 2015 Uniform Plumbing Code, addresses the installation of sewage ejectors or sewage pumps receiving the discharge of multiple fixtures including water closets or urinals. The two pump requirement found in Section 710.9, provides public use occupancies the ability to repair a failed pump without loss of the building sanitary service. The failure of a pump serving a single fixture would not affect the rest of the plumbing system and would therefore not require an additional pump.
 
UPC 2015 710.3, 710.9
Topic:
If sewage ejector(s) with sump is located in a commercial building and only receives the discharge from air-conditioning unit(s), are dual pumps required?

Comment:
This code section stated that "Such sumps and receiving tanks shall be automatically discharged and, where in a "public use" occupancy, shall be provided with dual pumps or ejectors arranged to function alternately in normal use and independently in case of overload or mechanical failure." From my understanding, "Such sumps and receiving tanks" are referring to Section 710.3, therefore, I believe only the ejectors or pumps receiving the discharge of water closets or urinals shall required to be dual pumps in public use occupancy.
No. Section 710.3 of the 2015 Uniform Plumbing Code, addresses the installation of sewage ejectors or sewage pumps receiving the discharge of multiple fixtures including water closets or urinals. The two pump requirement found in Section 710.9, provides public use occupancies the ability to repair a failed pump without loss of the building sanitary service. The failure of a pump receiving only the waste from air conditioning condensate would not affect the rest of the plumbing system and would therefore not require an additional pump.
 
UPC 2018 710.3
Topic: Sewage Ejectors and Pumps
Is there a special certificate required to install, service or repair Sewage Ejectors and Pumps?

Comment:
I am being told by my supervisor that Sewage Ejectors and Pumps are considered ‘specialized equipment’.
As a plumber who completed 5 years apprenticeship (local 78) training, NITC Journeyman certification and a Journey-level Plumber License from the City of Los Angeles, I believe I am qualified to do the piping, installation and/or replacement of Sewage Ejectors and Pumps. The supervisor thinks that such work requires a separate certification.
Per Section 103.3.1 of the 2018 Uniform Plumbing Code, a license to install plumbing is determined by the Authority Having Jurisdiction. Installation of sewage ejectors and pumps falls within the guidelines found Chapter 7 of the Uniform Plumbing Code and is considered part of the plumbing system and should therefore be installed by an individual deemed qualified to do so by the Authority Having Jurisdiction.
 
UPC 2018 711.0
Topic: Suds Relief
If we design a DWV system with a separate stack to catch the second and third floor suds producing fixtures, does this code not apply because we are receiving the discharge from only two stories of plumbing fixtures?

Comment:
We are in the process of planning the plumbing waste and vent underground of a 3 story apartment building and request clarification regarding suds relief.
This installation would not be required to meet the requirements found in Section 711.1 of the 2018 Uniform Plumbing Code. Exception (2) of that code section specifically exempts stacks receiving the discharge from less than three stories of plumbing fixtures from meeting the requirements for suds relief.
 
UPC 2018 715.3
Topic: Existing Sewers
1. Can you provide clarification on the use of pipe-bursting installation relating to sewer line repairs, cast iron in particular?

Comment:
Our city has a significant number of cast iron sewer lines, with many repairs occurring every week. The direction we have received during code adoption training courses is "pipe bursting" as a method of repair of sewer lines is not permitted. However, reading the code section, it indicates that cast iron cannot be repaired using cured-in-place and resin impregnated tubes. This is not the same as pipe bursting since the tube used is solid-walled.
Though pipe bursting using polyethylene plastic pipe would be considered a type of trenchless installation, it does not fall within the parameters of ASTM F1216 the standard for cured-in place pipe liners and would not be subject to the restrictions found in Section 715.3 of the 2018 UPC. Pipe bursting using polyethylene plastic pipe is a pipe replacement system using trenchless technology and must meet the requirements found in ASTM F714(Standard Specification for Polyethylene(PE)Plastic Pipe(DR-PR)Based on Outside Diameter. (see 2018 UPC, Table 701.2) ASTM F714 references ASTM F894 Standard Guide for Insertion of Flexible Polyethylene Pipe Into Existing Sewers as an installation guide.
 
UPC 2012 710.7
Topic: Drainage and Venting Systems
The code does not appear to have a specific section that calls out or covers approved pipe and fittings material for a pump or pressurized system. However, Section 710.7 establishes requirements for drainage and venting of sump pump system designs and installations to be the same as gravity flow DWV. If I am interpreting or reading this section correctly, section 710.7 allows the use of all materials (pipe and fittings) approved under Table 701.1 (DWV) can also be used for pressurized application?

Comment:
The dilemma is most materials listed in Table 701.1 is listed to national standards for gravity flow and not pressurized application and therefore, contradict the intended application within the scope of the standard? An example is PVC pipe and fittings listed to ASTM D2665. Therefore, I would like further clarification.
Section 710.7 of the 2012 Uniform Plumbing Code states that the the use of pipe and fittings for gravity waste systems, found in Table 701.1, may be used for “fixtures, sumps, receiving tanks, and mechanical waste-lifting devices.
 
UPC 2018 715.3
Topic: Existing Sewers
1. Does section 715.3 prohibit the use of pipe bursting to replace cast iron sewer systems?
2. Is section 715.3 intended to only prohibit the use of cured-in-place rehabilitation of existing cast iron sewer pipe?
3. What is the applicable code section which allows or refers to using the pipe-bursting trenchless methodology?
4. Where would the specifications and installation requirements for pipe-bursting be found?
1. No. ASTM F1216, referenced in Section 715.3 of the 2018 Uniform Plumbing Code, is the standard for the rehabilitation of existing pipelines and conduits by the inversion and curing of a resin-impregnated tube. Pipe bursting utilizing PE pipe, is a pipe replacement system, not a pipe lining system.
2. Yes
3. Per Table 701.2, Polyethylene pipe used for building sewers shall be required to meet the requirements found in both ASTM F714 and ASTM F894. The standard ASTM F714, states in Section 1.3, that “the piping is intended for new construction and insertion renewal of old piping systems used for the transport of water, municipal sewage, domestic sewage, industrial process liquids, effluents, slurries, etc., in both pressure and non-pressure systems”. Referenced in ASTM F714 is ASTM F585, the “Standard Guide for Insertion of Flexible Polyethylene Pipe Into Existing Sewers”.
4. Table 701.2 and the associated standards for Polyethylene sewer pipe.
5. ASTM F585

Note: Installation Standard 26-2006, found in the 2012 Uniform Plumbing Code, gave guidelines for the insertion of Polyethylene pipe for sewer laterals. This standard has been updated and will be available in the 2021 version of the Uniform Plumbing Code.
 
UPC 2018 710.13.3
Topic: Macerating Toilet System Venting
1. Does section 710.13 require that the water closet discharging into a macerating toilet system have an individual 2” vent for the water closet?
2. Is the vent for the sump of the macerating toilet system also considered the vent for the water closet?
3. If yes, is the vent required to be a minimum of 2 inches?

Comment:
See attached illustration from the 2019 E-Official Magazine
1. No. The installation of macerating toilet systems, per Section 710.13 of the 2018 Uniform Plumbing Code, shall comply with ASME A112.3.4/CSA B45.9(Macerating Toilet Systems and Waste Pumping Systems for Plumbing Fixtures) and the manufacturer’s instructions. Section 4.3.1 of ASME A112.3.4/CSA B45.9, states that water closets connected to macerating toilet systems must: a) meet applicable standards, b) be tested before connection to the macerating toilet system and c) be tested as a system, when the water closets have integral grinders and pumps. The manufacturer’s installation instructions for listed macerating toilet systems, shows that when the water closet is directly connected to the ejector holding tank, an additional vent for the water closet is not required.
2. Yes. Water closets, directly attached to the ejector holding tank, are part of a tested and listed system. In the event the ejector holding tank is installed remotely from the water closet, the water closet shall be vented per the requirements found in Section 710.13.3.
3. No. This installation of a macerating toilet system is tested and listed as a system and must meet the requirements found in ASME A112.3.4/CSA B45.9 and the manufacturer’s installation requirements.
Image
 
UPC 2018 710.13
Topic: Macerating Toilet and Pumped Waste System
Would 710.13 be the proper section to reference when determining criteria for pumps serving only a single fixture in a commercial application (such as a break room sink)?

Comment:
We think a pump such as the one linked below may be used to serve a single sink in a commercial application but have not been able to determine whether it is a code compliant installation. The applicable code reference and associated installation criteria has been a matter of debate for us with certain inspection agencies, even when applied to fixtures that are installed above ground level but below the building drain elevation.
Yes. Section 710.13 of the 2018 Uniform Plumbing Code, permits pumped waste systems approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, complying with ASME A112.3.4/CSA B 45.9 and installed per the manufactures installation instruction to be used in lieu of a sewage pump system. The submitted pump and pit assembly is listed by an approved testing agency, CSA, to the aforementioned standard.
Image
 
UPC 2006 711.0
Topic: Suds Relief
1. Are vent lines, pressure relief lines, or sovent deaerators considered to be drainage connections, and required to be 8 feet away from the vertical to horizontal change?

Comment:
We are currently designing a replacement sanitary waste system using a sovent system on Oahu, Hawaii. The current plumbing code in Hawaii is the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code.
The sovent manufacturer's design manuals state that the deaerators must be located where the vertical to horizontal change occurs in the drainage system, and that the sovent system can handle suds, however the local department of plans and permitting states that we must have the deaerator 8 feet above the vertical to horizontal change.
No. Section 711.0 of the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code specifically states that “drainage connections shall not be made into a drainage piping system with eight(8) feet of an vertical to horizontal change in direction of a stack containing suds-producing fixtures”.

A Sovent systems is a single stack vent system and is addressed in Appendix L, Section L 8.0 of the 2006 UPC. This appendix must be adopted by the local jurisdictions before it becomes part of the code. Per Section L 8.1 of the 2006 UPC, “single-stack venting shall be designed by a registered professional engineer as an engineered design.” The professional engineer may use the manufacturer’s design manual in his/her design.
 
UPC 2018 706.2
Topic: Changes of Direction, Horizontal to Vertical
1. Is it code compliant to use a 3" double fixture fitting installed in a vertical position on a 3" waste stack and connect two 3" horizontal waste lines into the branch inlets?
2. Does this double fixture fitting comply to the requirements listed in section 706.2?
1. No. Horizontal waste piping connecting to a vertical stack, per Section 706.2 of the 2018 Uniform Plumbing Code, shall be made with 45 degree wye branches, 60 degree wye branches, combination wye and one-eighth bend branches, sanitary tees sanitary tapped tee branches or other approved fittings of equivalent sweep. The only mention of double fixture fittings is found in Section 704.2, as the required fitting for back-to-back and side-by-side fixtures.
2. No. The design of a double fixture fittings is to permit the installation of back-to-back or side-by-side fixtures using a single waste stack and vent.
 
UPC 2015 710.4
Topic: Discharge Line
1. Does the discharge line need to comply to the materials listed on Table 701.2 for waste piping?
2. If the material is pressure rated and suitable for the TDH, could the material be Type K copper?

Comment: Section 710.4 indicates that discharge line shall be of approved pressure rated material.
Note: This code change was approved by the Uniform Plumbing Code Technical Committee and IAPMO membership during the 2012 to 2015 code change cycle. The substantiation by the proponent for the change stated that the "UPC is silent on the type of material that is approved for the discharge lines and therefore should be addressed for ease of enforcement and application".
1. No. The discharge piping, per Section 710.4, must be an approved pressure rated material. The total dynamic head* needed to produce the desired outcome will dictate the pressure rating required for the pipe. Many of the materials listed in Table 701.2 are listed for non-pressure use only.
2. Pressure rated pipe that meets the total dynamic head required for the installation would be acceptable. Although Type K copper would most likely be acceptable, pressure rating for the material would dictate if it could be used.
*Total Dynamic Head (TDH) is the total equivalent height that a fluid is to be pumped, taking into account friction losses in the pipe
 
UPC 2018 701.3.3
Topic: Drainage Fitting Type
1. Does the UPC allow the use of flexible corrugated pipe for drainage fittings? If so, under what conditions?

Comment:
Section 701.3.3 requires a "smooth interior waterway" which would seem to rule out corrugated pipe. However, there are bath waste assemblies such as Kohler model K-7265 which is cUPC listed on file# 4497 and use corrugated brass pipe.
1. A tub waste and overflow is considered a waste fitting per Section 404.1* of the 2018 Uniform Plumbing Code and not a drainage fitting. The referenced bathtub waste and overflow is tested to ASME A112.18.2-2015/CSA B125.2-15 and listed as complying with both the Uniform Plumbing Code and the National Pluming Code of Canada, per File #4497. Section 409.2 of the 2018 Uniform Plumbing Code, states that bathtub waste and overflows shall meet the requirements found in Section 701.2 for materials and Section 404.1 for the installation of overflows.

*404.1 Waste Fittings. Waste fittings shall comply with ASME A112.18.2/CSA B125.2, ASTM F409 or Table 701.2 for aboveground drainage piping and fittings.
Image 1 Image 2
 
UPC 2012 711.0
Topic: Suds Relief, General
1. Would it be acceptable to connect 2 suds producing stacks that are in close proximity together to make one suds producing stack as noted on the attached?

2. Can we tie 2 or more suds producing stacks together within 8 feet of each other as shown on the attached?

Comment:
Section states that you cannot connect piping within 8 feet vertical or horizontal of a suds producing stack. This statement can be read as we cannot tie 2 suds producing stacks together within 8 feet.
 
UPC 2018 710.13.3
Topic: Macerating Toilet System Venting
1. Does section 710.13 require that the water closet discharging into a macerating toilet system have an individual 2” vent for the water closet?
2. Is the vent for the sump of the macerating toilet system also considered the vent for the water closet?
3. If yes, is the vent required to be a minimum of 2 inches?
1. No. The installation of macerating toilet systems, per Section 710.13 of the Uniform Plumbing Code, shall comply with ASME A112.3.4/CSA B45.9 and the manufacturer’s instructions. The manufacturer’s installation instructions for listed macerating toilet systems, shows that when the water closet is directly connected to the ejector holding tank, an additional vent for the water closet is not required.
2. Yes. Water closets, directly attached to the ejector holding tank, are part of a tested and listed system. In the event the ejector holding tank is installed remotely from the water closet, the water closet shall be vented per the requirements found in Section 710.13.3.
3. No. This installation of a macerating toilet system is tested and listed as a system and must meet the requirements found in ASME A112.3.4/CSA B45.9 and the manufacturer’s installation requirements.
 
UPC 2018 710.13
Topic: Macerating Toilet and Pumped Waste System
Would 710.13 be the proper section to reference when determining criteria for pumps serving only a single fixture in a commercial application (such as a break room sink)?
Yes. Section 710.13 of the 2018 Uniform Plumbing Code, permits pumped waste systems approved by the Authority Having Jurisdiction, complying with ASME A112.3.4/CSA B 45.9 and installed per the manufactures installation instruction to be used in lieu of a sewage pump system.
 
UPC 2015 710.4
Topic: Discharge Line
1. In Section 710.4, what is meant by "approved pressure rated material?
2. Are all of the materials Listed in Table 701.2 approved for discharge waste lines?
1. "Approved pressure rated material", refers to a material capable of withstanding the *Total Dynamic Head (TDH) produced by the pump. This requirement is satisfied by verification of the pressure rating of the material.
2. No, many of the materials listed in Table 701.2 are listed for non-pressure use only.

*Total Dynamic Head (TDH) is the total equivalent height that a fluid is to be pumped, taking into account friction losses in the pipe.
 
UPC 2015 707.1, 707.4
Topic: Cleanouts
1. Does the vertical cleanout piping and cleanout body for the cleanout plug need to be full sized to the 2" waste line with a 1-1/2" cleanout plug?
1. Yes. Table 707.1 of the 2015 Uniform Plumbing Code, specifies the size of pipe in the left column and cleanout size in the middle column. The body of the cleanout would be required to be 2” and the cleanout opening 1-1/2”.
 
UPC 2003 705.0 UPC 2006 705.0 UPC 2009 705.0 UPC 2012 705.0 UPC 2015 705.0
Topic: DWV Mechanical Joint
I’m a licensed plumber trying to comply with UPC.
I need to choose a suitable elastomeric mechanical coupling for a pressurized drain line joining cast iron and PVC DWV.
Does it need to be shielded or unshielded?
What section in the 2015 UPC gives direction on what coupling is required?
Elastomeric mechanical couplings for use with dissimilar materials are tested and listed to ASTM C1460-2012 (for shielded connectors above grade use) and ASTM C1173-2010 (for un-shielded connectors below grade use). Both types of connectors are hydrostatically tested as part of the product testing process, but are not listed as acceptable for pressure type installations. Additionally, elastomeric mechanical couplings used for hubless cast iron are listed and tested to ASTM C1277-2015, are also hydrostatically tested but again are not listed for prolonged pressure installations.
 
UPC 2015 710.7, 710.4, 706.0-706.4
Topic: Pressure rated fittings
Are approved pressure-rated fittings installed on ejector pump discharge lines, required to comply with sections 706-706.4 Changes in Direction of Drainage Flow?

Comment
710.7 Drainage and Venting Systems. The drainage and venting systems, in connection with fixtures, sumps, receiving tanks, and mechanical waste-lifting devices shall be installed under the same requirements as provided for in this code for gravity systems.
710.4 Discharge Line. The discharge line from such ejector, pump, or other mechanical device shall be of approved pressure rated material
706.0 Changes in Direction of Drainage Flow.
706.1 Approved Fittings. Changes in direction of drainage piping shall be made by the appropriate use of approved fittings and shall be of the angles presented by a one-sixteenth bend, one-eighth bend, or one-sixth bend, or other approved fittings of equivalent sweep.
Yes. The pumped waste line is considered drainage pipe and the rules for drainage piping shall apply. The pipe and fittings must be rated to withstand the pressures imposed by the ejector pumps.
 
UPC 2015 703.2, Appendix B
Topic: Pipe Sizing
In Table 703.2, 2-1/2 inch pipe has been deleted. That leads one to believe that 2-1/2 inch pipe size is no longer to be considered when sizing a waste and vent system.
In Appendix B, Section B 101.6.1 several pipe sizes are referenced that are not included in Table 703.2 including 2-1/2”, 3-1/2” and 4-1/2”.

Does the UPC still recognize these imaginary pipe sizes for sizing purposes?
The pipe sizes shown in Table 703.2 of the 2015 UPC are actual dimensions of pipe that are available for installation. Section 910.7 references Appendix B for explanatory notes on the design of combination waste and vent systems. As stated in Section B 101.6.1 of Appendix B, the pipe sizes, 2-1/2”, 3-1/2” and 4-1/2” are used specifically for the sizing of floor drain traps on combination waste and vent systems. Section B 101.2 requires combination waste and vent systems to be two pipe sizes larger than conventional systems and by using the ½ pipe sizes it makes the actual required size only one inch larger than the floor drain size. See B 101.6.1 Example of sizing.
 
UPC 2003 707.2 UPC 2006 707.1 UPC 2009 707.2 UPC 2012 707.2 UPC 2015 707.2
Topic: Cleanouts
1. Is it permitted to use the trap arm of a fixture as an "approved type" of cleanout fitting per 707.2.
No. The removal of a trap arm, in lieu of a code compliant clean-out, for the purpose of cleaning out the fixture waste piping is not permissible. Requirements for code compliant clean-outs may be found in Section 707.0.
Note: Section 707.2 states “Each cleanout fitting and each cleanout plug or cap shall be an approved type”.
 
UPC 2003 707.6 UPC 2006 707.6 UPC 2009 707.5 UPC 2012 707.5 UPC 2015 707.5
Topic: Cleaning
Is the intent of this code to have a cleanout at the base of every stack?
No, not every waste stack is required to have a cleanout. Section 707.4 of the 2012 UPC, gives specifics as to the number and location of cleanouts on waste piping. Exceptions (1) and (3) of that section are pertinent to the question. Exception (1) requires cleanouts on horizontal drain lines over 5 feet in length. Exception (3) states that “excepting the building drain and its horizontal branches, a cleanout shall not be required on a pipe or piping that is above the floor level of the lowest floor of the building.” Cleanouts would therefore be required on waste stacks connecting to horizontal branches exceeding 5 feet in length that are part of the building drain system. (see definition of building drain)
 
UPC 2003 720.0 UPC 2006 720.0 UPC 2009 720.0 UPC 2012 720.1 UPC 2015 720.1
Topic: Sewer and Water Pipes
When using Schedule 40 ABS/PVC DWV piping for a building sewer can it be located in the same trench as water pipes with no special restrictions/requirements?
Yes, if the water piping and sewer pipe are approved for installation below grade within a building, they may be laid in the same trench without stipulation.
Sections 609.2 and 720.0 of the 2015 UPC both have specific requirements for water pipes and building sewers that are laid in the same ditch. Materials, either water piping and/or sewer pipe, not approved below grade within a building must be shelved as stipulated in both Sections 609.2 and 720.0.
 
UPC 2003 710.7 UPC 2006 710.7 UPC 2009 710.7 UPC 2012 707.11 UPC 2015 710.4
Topic: Discharge Line
1. Does the pressurized discharge line from an ejector or pump require an additional clean out at every 100 feet or when exceeding 135° horizontal change of direction?
Yes. Per Section 707.11 of the 2015 UPC, pressure drainage systems shall be provided with cleanouts as prescribed in Section 710.7 which states, “the drainage and venting systems, in connection with fixtures, sumps, receiving tanks, and mechanical waste-lifting devices, shall be installed under the same requirements as provided for in this code for gravity systems.” See Sections 707.4 and 719.0 for cleanout requirements for gravity sanitary drainage and sewer systems.
 
UPC 2015 710.4
Topic: Discharge Line
1. Is the pressure rating material required in the section supposed to be pressure rated PVC water piping and fittings?

2. If it is, is it permitted to use the typical PVC close rough 90° fitting which will be more likely to cause stoppage and you certainly will not be able to pass a 2” ball through?

3. Or would we be requited to use 45° elbows to make a 90° change in direction?

Comment: The section now requires the discharge line be pressure rated. According to their specifications I found neither ABS DWV nor PVC DWV are intended for pressure rated drainage applications. As a building official what can I tell contractors to use to satisfy this requirement?
This code change was approved by the Uniform Plumbing Code Technical Committee and IAPMO membership during the 2012 to 2015 code change cycle. The substantiation by the proponent for the change stated that the “UPC is silent on the type of material that is approved for the discharge lines and therefore should be addressed for ease of enforcement and application”.
1. Yes. The discharge piping, per Section 710.4, must be an approved pressure rated material. The total dynamic head* needed to produce the desired outcome will dictate the pressure rating required for the pipe.
2. Section 710.3(3), requires sewage ejector pumps and associated piping, for “other than single-dwelling units”, to be able to pass a 2 inch diameter solid ball through a 3 inch discharge line. Discharge piping includes all fittings, backwater valves and gate valves.
3. Fittings capable of meeting the requirements found in Section 710.3(3) would be acceptable.

*Total Dynamic Head (TDH) is the total equivalent height that a fluid is to be pumped, taking into account friction losses in the pipe.
 
UPC 2015 710.4
Topic: Discharge Line
The section now requires the discharge line be pressure rated.

1, Does the pressure rated discharge line begin at the pump inside the sump or at the discharge outlet of the sump?

2. If in your opinion it begins at the outlet of the pump, would the unshielded coupling typically used have to be replaced with pressure rated unions.

Comment:
As of the 2005 UPC this section now requires the discharge line be of pressure rated materials. Want to know at what point the requirement begins.
1. Yes. Per Section 710.4 of the 2015 UPC requires “approved pressure rated material” for the discharge piping for all sewage ejectors. That material is required from the pump to the connection to the gravity waste line.
2. All fittings installed on the discharge line from the sewage ejector shall be pressure rated for the total dynamic head* needed to produce the desired outcome.

*Total Dynamic Head (TDH) is the total equivalent height that a fluid is to be pumped, taking into account friction losses in the pipe.
 
UPC 2012 705.11 UPC 2015 705.1.1
Topic: Joints and Connections
1. Are all rubber coupling (fernco) permitted for use in a building drain?
2. Are they permitted for use underground in a building drain?
Comment:
As a building inspector, and a Journeyman Plumber it has been my training and understanding that no rubber couplings are permitted inside a building above or below ground. It seems the code used to be clear on the use of shielded couplings inside a building. This is being used to tie an addition into existing ground-work. Plastic to plastic.
Section 705.9 of the 2015 Uniform Plumbing Code requires joints between various materials to be installed per the manufacturer’s instructions and mechanical couplings used to join different materials for below ground use to meet the requirements of ASTM C1173. Unshielded elastomeric couplings are tested and listed per the requirements found in ASTM C1173. The scope of the standard as well as the IAPMO listing for the product in question (see IAPMO Certificate of Listing – File 5895) stipulates that this particular brand of unshielded elastomeric couplings may be installed both in underground drainage as well as sewer piping applications.
 
UPC 2003 707.4 Exceptions 1 through 4 UPC 2006 707.4 Exceptions 1 through 4 UPC 2009 707.4 Exceptions 1 through 4 UPC 2012 707.4 Exceptions 1 through 4 UPC 2015 707.4 Exceptions 1 through 4
Topic: Location
An ejector pump is serving the basement bathroom group, and everything else is gravity feed to the building drain/sewer.
1. Does this require two separate systems that need full size cleanouts in each system?
2. Would this also mean that the exceptions in 707.4 not apply?
1. Yes, there are two separate drainage systems in this scenario. A gravity system, with fixtures located above the elevation of the building sewer, and a pump system with fixtures located below the elevation of the building sewer. Per Section 709.1, the gravity system must drain by gravity to the building sewer. The pumped system on the other hand, has gravity waste piping that connects to an ejector receiving tank, with the waste being pumped to the building sewer. The lowest piping of each drainage system would be considered as a seperate “building drain*” and would be required to have cleanouts sized and installed as prescribed in Section 707.0.
2. Each drainage system is considered to be a building drain and applicable cleanout requirements would apply.
Building Drain. That part of the lowest piping of a drainage system that receives the discharge from soil, waste, and other drainage pipes inside the walls of the building and conveys it to the building sewer beginning 2 feet (610 mm) outside the building wall.